October 13th, 2008Online Bullying: Is It Really So Bad?
Last week I was having a rather heated discussion with someone, let’s call him Kenji, at the local coffee house regarding online bullying. He had been rather adamant that people under the age of 17 should not be permitted to join chat rooms or have blogs, in the event that they’re bullied to the point where suicide becomes the only option of escape. Having been bullied quite often in my youth, I said that such protectionist measures would do nothing to solve the real issues, and would not eliminate the constant cajoling and taunting that goes on from the moment we’re born.
So what’s the most workable solution to bullying?
Kenji’s Opinion: Dismiss and Punish to Prevent
Having spent his entire life in Japan, Kenji has first hand knowledge of growing up in a society where the youth are often pushed to extremes by everyone around them. Students must be part of at least one club activity in order to “fit in” at school, and parents are always pushing their children to get phenomenal grades in every class before sending them off to a juku (cram school) after the day’s lessons are complete. From the age of 12 to 17, students often get by on just five to six hours of sleep, and are out of the house or studying intently for the rest of the day.
Although we all hear stories like this about schools in Japan, the reality is really quite different. Sure this might happen with some students, but most have a little free time here and there so that they can enjoy their youth. That said; the average Japanese student still has about 1/10th the free time of their North American counterparts.
Regardless of how much free time a person has, the type of bullies that exist here in Japan are just the same as you would find anywhere in the world. Many bullies do what they do because they’re not happy at home, or they’re not happy with themselves, or they just enjoy being bigger than everyone and want to flex their muscle in any way possible. Regardless of the cause, the effects of bullying are quite real: people are made to feel inferior.
When students go online to write a blog post, communicate with friends, or be part of an online forum, the last thing they want to deal with is abuse. To combat the growing rise of bullying on this medium, Kenji feels that it would be best to prevent students from participating in any online communities. Not only would this give them more time to study, but it would prevent students from being targeted by bullies and sexual predators. When these students reach an appropriate age, which is supposedly somewhere around 17, they will have a better handle on their emotions and be able to handle bullies more effectively.
How would students be better able to handle bullies at 17? I asked.
“Students should be given the power to immediately report bullying to a teacher or police officer in order to bring the offender to justice in a swift and orderly manner,” Kenji tells me.
Essentially, Kenji feels that we should dismiss the rights of the individual by banning the use of a (relatively) safe communications medium and promoting the act of tattle-tailing in order to quickly bring bullies in line with what society expects of them. Rather than let our young people use the internet as a communications medium and learning tool while showing them how to handle idiots, we’re supposed to keep our net connections locked down just in case somebody hurts their feelings?
I can understand that some parents want to protect their children from all harm, but this level of protectionism is just lunacy.
My Opinion (Not That It Matters): Educate and Encourage
Until the age of 14, I was always “the fat kid.” Forever wearing track pants because jeans would seldom fit long enough to be worth the money, I was the butt of every joke. It didn’t help that I came from a poorer family, nor did my rather explosive temper. However, with the help of some great teachers and role models, I learned how to control my rage (externally) and deal with people who wanted to see me dead. Without the guidance from people I respected, and the encouragement I received from my parents whenever I accomplished something worthwhile, I never would have enjoyed my youth and would have likely become a very dark and negative person with pent up rage and a grudge on life.
To this day, the lessons that I had learned from teachers like Mr. Robinson, Mr. Neil, Mr. Castle and Ms. Laidlaw continue to help me get through the most difficult situations where I am being discriminated against or otherwise treated unfairly. Rather than tattle to a superior about how so-and-so said this or that about me, it’s much simpler to just let it slide. One of the best ways I’ve found to handle personal slander is to respond in a direct fashion, while giving the impression of misinterpretation.
“You’re such a @#$!ing douce, Jason.”
“What’s so bad about being clean?”
“I’ve never seen such a pitiful excuse for a report. You expect me to pay you for this?”
“The numbers don’t lie. Clearly you can’t manage a business. I do expect to be paid but, after seeing this report, I’d rather receive cash than a cheque.”
Well … I don’t recommend using that last one too casually, but the fact of the matter remains. So long as a person is confident in themself and knows how to handle abusive dolts, bullying online will be less of a problem. Kids are pretty tough and don’t need to be protected as much as some people think. All it takes is a little education and encouragement from others.
Of course, online bullies can sometimes seem larger than life. Rather than have one or two people attack you, like in most real situations, it’s possible to have thousands of people attacking you simultaneously. In the case of some recent online suicides, some mocking dolt would happen upon a blog post or live video stream of a person who was feeling particularly depressed and send the link to friends around the world. From there, friends of friends would receive the link and the number of people following something would quickly snowball into the thousands. Regardless of what the depressed individual says, their words are twisted and spat back at them in a devastatingly deriding fashion, which would then lead to an unfortunate circumstance. In a few cases, people have actually hung themselves while people watched through the webcam. Even in death, their mocking laughs and hurtful words filled the screen of the recently deceased. Quickly bored by the sight of a cooling corpse swinging from the ceiling, they congratulate themselves and move on to the next unwitting victim. Never once will they give a second thought to the fact that they were responsible for a person’s death.
I’m disgusted every time I think of the news story.
The media response to this is always the same, too. They scream and holler that Kenji’s “solution” should be put into effect to save the lives of countless other people. They point fingers, blaming everything from rap music to video games to the de-humanizing nature of the internet. But never once do they ask the real questions: where were the parents, and why didn’t they see the long-term patterns in their own children?
Should we prevent kids from living through this solitary horror? Oh, yes. But we shouldn’t do it with restrictions. Again, education and encouragement is the only way a person can bounce back from those days where it seems there’s nothing left to live for.
Your Opinion: <Insert Keywords Here>
What do you think we should do about online bullying? Bullies have been around since life began so many years ago, and they’ll continue to be with us until long after the sun goes cold. Should society attack bullies with reason and compassion? Should parents be held more accountable for the emotional and psychological well-being of their children? I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter.















































I’m not so sure that there is anything we can do about the bullying (online or otherwise) but I think it’s the teaching of people how to handle/deal with it that would be the best solution. As far as not letting people under 17 be online, have blogs, etc; I can see that side of the argument (especially with the revealing of personal information) but do not think it would be a logical or feasible solution. As with most things in life, the best solution is to better educate
You can actually agree with some of the people that want to keep “kids” offline until 17? Please enlighten us, Nick. I’d love to hear how the internet is similar to other dangers such as alcohol, cigarettes and voting
My thoughts on limiting the online activities of younger people are more for their own protection than for reasons dealing with bullies and such. This is mostly due to the fact that their judgement may not be as well developed as that of an older individual and their “attractiveness” to “predators” is higher.
For example, I think about some of the things that Shoemoney has said about times they have had to get law enforcement and the FBI involved regarding threats and stalkers that have found him via the internet. Now change that from an adult male to your 16 year-old daughter and you might start getting an idea of what I am talking about. These problems all come when people (especially teens) begin to reveal personal information online and even though they may not intend to, I think they might reveal more information than they realize and it could easily become a safety issue for them and their families.
This is just the side of the arguement that I can see and understand (and I’m not sure how much I agree with it), but like I said before, it would not be a logical or feasible solution (and it wouldn’t really be reasonable either) but more/better education is what is needed.
I can certainly see why you can agree with some people who think we should limit the activities of our youth online, however, people typically learn from mistakes. Perhaps if someone makes a big enough mistake, they can teach lots of others to be more responsible when sharing their personal information online.
All this said, I don’t think age has very much to do with it. There are quite a few “adults” who will foolishly give just a bit too much personal information online without considering the possible consequences. At the end of the day, talking to people online is not very different from speaking to strangers at a crowded bar on Friday; people are generally decent, but you need to be aware that some are only out for one thing
Is Kenji the same guy who said the world was a disc? Anyway, removing anonymity is one way to reduce the online abuse since people are generally more cautious when they can be held accountable. Some kind of training in how to deal with online bullies wouldn’t go amiss. Most of us have learned the hard way to be extremely careful what to say and when to say it, especially on controversial topics, but school doesn’t seem too interested in teaching useful skills.
No, this is a different Kenji. Kenji and Tomoko are the two main (Japanese) characters in some of the textbooks at my work, so I use them as the default names for male and female Japanese people that I either disagree with, or don’t want to offend
It’s interesting that you’d mention that schools should be the one responsible for teaching children how to deal with bullies. Considering how the Japanese education system is designed to help students pass tests, rather than excel in their passions, I don’t think it would be a very practical subject. This is something that should be handled by family, I think
The advantage schools have is that the children are a captured audience. Children can learn social skills from their parents, especially if mum and dad lead by example, but getting them to sit down and think out the consequences of their responses in an online “debate” would be a challenge for any parent.